Global prevalence of Wilson’s disease is estimated to be between 1 in 10,000 and 1 in 30,000 people.1
Studies have found prevalence of the genetic mutations associated with Wilson’s disease to be up to four times higher than current disease prevalence estimates,2 which suggests the disease may be underdiagnosed.3
A 2012 survey across six European countries found that half of people diagnosed with Wilson’s disease waited more than six months for a diagnosis, and one fifth waited between one and three years.4
Approximately half of people with Wilson’s disease reported being initially misdiagnosed.4
If left untreated, Wilson’s disease can progress to acute liver failure, which may require costly liver transplantation.5-7 A study in Germany that examined hospitalisations for Wilson’s disease in 2017 found that, although fewer than 10% of inpatients received a liver transplant, they accounted for almost 50% of the total annual inpatient costs associated with the disease.8
Between 20% and 45% of people do not follow their treatment regimen for an extended period of time, despite Wilson’s disease requiring lifelong treatment to avoid serious complications and premature death.9-12
Non-adherence can result in the worsening of neurological symptoms in 10–50% of people.13 14
Side effects have been reported to lead to approximately 30% of people living with Wilson’s disease discontinuing their treatment.13
A study conducted in Poland found that people living with Wilson’s disease who presented with neurological symptoms were less likely to progress through education and were less able to work than the general population.10
People who receive an early diagnosis, timely initiation of lifelong treatment, and long-term regular monitoring can have a similar quality of life and life expectancy to the general population.15
Because Wilson’s disease is rare, awareness among healthcare professionals can be low.16
There is no single test that can establish a diagnosis for Wilson’s disease.17 Diagnosis involves a healthcare professional considering a number of clinical assessments combined with biomarker testing.9 15 18